lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200521144030.201a4f22@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 May 2020 14:40:30 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Vinay Kumar Yadav <vinay.yadav@...lsio.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        secdev@...lsio.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/tls: fix race condition causing kernel
 panic

On Fri, 22 May 2020 02:02:10 +0530 Vinay Kumar Yadav wrote:
> When writer reads pending == 0,
> that means completion is already called complete().
> its okay writer to  initialize completion. When writer reads pending == 1,
> that means writer is going to wait for completion.
> 
> This way, writer is not going to proceed to encrypt next record on CPU0 without complete().

I assume by writer you mean the CPU queuing up the records.

The writer does not wait between records, just before returning to user
space. The writer can queue multiple records then wait.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ