lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 21 May 2020 15:09:57 -0700
From:   Jacob Keller <>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <>, Ido Schimmel <>
Cc:     Jiri Pirko <>,
        "" <>,,
Subject: Re: devlink interface for asynchronous event/messages from firmware?

On 5/21/2020 2:51 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 21 May 2020 13:59:32 -0700 Jacob Keller wrote:
>>>> So the ice firmware can optionally send diagnostic debug messages via
>>>> its control queue. The current solutions we've used internally
>>>> essentially hex-dump the binary contents to the kernel log, and then
>>>> these get scraped and converted into a useful format for human consumption.
>>>> I'm not 100% of the format, but I know it's based on a decoding file
>>>> that is specific to a given firmware image, and thus attempting to tie
>>>> this into the driver is problematic.  
>>> You explained how it works, but not why it's needed :)  
>> Well, the reason we want it is to be able to read the debug/diagnostics
>> data in order to debug issues that might be related to firmware or
>> software mis-use of firmware interfaces.
>> By having it be a separate interface rather than trying to scrape from
>> the kernel message buffer, it becomes something we can have as a
>> possibility for debugging in the field.
> For pure debug/tracing perhaps trace_devlink_hwerr() is the right fit?
> Right Ido?

Hm, yes that might be more suitable for this purpose. I'll take a look
at it!


Powered by blists - more mailing lists