lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200522195456.73ddb852@carbon>
Date:   Fri, 22 May 2020 19:54:56 +0200
From:   Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc:     Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        daniel@...earbox.net, lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com,
        dsahern@...nel.org, brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC bpf-next 1/2] bpf: cpumap: add the possibility to attach a
 eBPF program to cpumap

On Fri, 22 May 2020 11:44:04 -0600
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:

> On 5/22/20 10:11 AM, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > @@ -259,28 +270,64 @@ static int cpu_map_kthread_run(void *data)
> >  		 * kthread CPU pinned. Lockless access to ptr_ring
> >  		 * consume side valid as no-resize allowed of queue.
> >  		 */
> > -		n = ptr_ring_consume_batched(rcpu->queue, frames, CPUMAP_BATCH);
> > +		n = ptr_ring_consume_batched(rcpu->queue, xdp_frames,
> > +					     CPUMAP_BATCH);
> >  
> > +		rcu_read_lock();
> > +
> > +		prog = READ_ONCE(rcpu->prog);
> >  		for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> > -			void *f = frames[i];
> > +			void *f = xdp_frames[i];
> >  			struct page *page = virt_to_page(f);
> > +			struct xdp_frame *xdpf;
> > +			struct xdp_buff xdp;
> > +			u32 act;
> >  
> >  			/* Bring struct page memory area to curr CPU. Read by
> >  			 * build_skb_around via page_is_pfmemalloc(), and when
> >  			 * freed written by page_frag_free call.
> >  			 */
> >  			prefetchw(page);
> > +			if (!prog) {
> > +				frames[nframes++] = xdp_frames[i];
> > +				continue;
> > +			}
> > +
> > +			xdpf = f;
> > +			xdp.data_hard_start = xdpf->data - xdpf->headroom;
> > +			xdp.data = xdpf->data;
> > +			xdp.data_end = xdpf->data + xdpf->len;
> > +			xdp.data_meta = xdpf->data - xdpf->metasize;
> > +			xdp.frame_sz = xdpf->frame_sz;
> > +			/* TODO: rxq */
> > +
> > +			act = bpf_prog_run_xdp(prog, &xdp);  
> 
> Why not run the program in cpu_map_enqueue before converting from
> xdp_buff to xdp_frame?

Because we want to run the XDP-prog on the remote-CPU.

-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ