lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzZy+iVMfVCHP-PT5hdeWwmjgqp5dpPvhzbz1bsateJN_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 22 May 2020 11:58:24 -0700
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:     Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 5/7] selftests/bpf: add BPF ringbuf selftests

On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 6:20 PM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 12:57:25PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ringbuf_multi.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ringbuf_multi.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..7eb85dd9cd66
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ringbuf_multi.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +// Copyright (c) 2019 Facebook
>
> oops ;)
>

heh, still living in good old 2019... :) fixing...

> > +
> > +#include <linux/bpf.h>
> > +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> > +
> > +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> > +
> > +struct sample {
> > +     int pid;
> > +     int seq;
> > +     long value;
> > +     char comm[16];
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct ringbuf_map {
> > +     __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_RINGBUF);
> > +     __uint(max_entries, 1 << 12);
> > +} ringbuf1 SEC(".maps"),
> > +  ringbuf2 SEC(".maps");
> > +
> > +struct {
> > +     __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS);
> > +     __uint(max_entries, 4);
> > +     __type(key, int);
> > +     __array(values, struct ringbuf_map);
> > +} ringbuf_arr SEC(".maps") = {
> > +     .values = {
> > +             [0] = &ringbuf1,
> > +             [2] = &ringbuf2,
> > +     },
> > +};
>
> the tests look great. Very easy to understand the usage model.

great, thanks!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ