[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c9e4bd02-5f29-de36-245f-edc7c4868208@web.de>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 16:34:56 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Perepech <andrew.perepech@...iatek.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Edwin Peer <edwin.peer@...adcom.com>,
Fabien Parent <fparent@...libre.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Pedro Tsai <pedro.tsai@...iatek.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Stephane Le Provost <stephane.leprovost@...iatek.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] net: devres: provide devm_register_netdev()
…
> +++ b/net/devres.c
> @@ -38,3 +38,58 @@ struct net_device *devm_alloc_etherdev_mqs(struct device *dev, int sizeof_priv,
…
> + * This is a devres variant of register_netdev() for which the unregister
> + * function will be call automatically when the managing device is
Is the following wording variant more appropriate?
+ * function will be automatically called when the managing device is
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists