netdev - [net-next 17/17] e1000e: disable s0ix entry and exit flows for ME systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200523025109.3313635-18-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 22 May 2020 19:51:09 -0700
From:   Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     Vitaly Lifshits <vitaly.lifshits@...el.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, nhorman@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com,
        Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>,
        Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Subject: [net-next 17/17] e1000e: disable s0ix entry and exit flows for ME systems

From: Vitaly Lifshits <vitaly.lifshits@...el.com>

Since ME systems do not support SLP_S0 in S0ix state, and S0ix entry
and exit flows may cause errors on them it is best to avoid using
e1000e_s0ix_entry_flow and e1000e_s0ix_exit_flow functions.

This was done by creating a struct of all devices that comes with ME
and by checking if the current device has ME.

Signed-off-by: Vitaly Lifshits <vitaly.lifshits@...el.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
index 66609cf689de..32f23a15ff64 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
@@ -107,6 +107,45 @@ static const struct e1000_reg_info e1000_reg_info_tbl[] = {
 	{0, NULL}
 };
 
+struct e1000e_me_supported {
+	u16 device_id;		/* supported device ID */
+};
+
+static const struct e1000e_me_supported me_supported[] = {
+	{E1000_DEV_ID_PCH_LPT_I217_LM},
+	{E1000_DEV_ID_PCH_LPTLP_I218_LM},
+	{E1000_DEV_ID_PCH_I218_LM2},
+	{E1000_DEV_ID_PCH_I218_LM3},
+	{E1000_DEV_ID_PCH_SPT_I219_LM},
+	{E1000_DEV_ID_PCH_SPT_I219_LM2},
+	{E1000_DEV_ID_PCH_LBG_I219_LM3},
+	{E1000_DEV_ID_PCH_SPT_I219_LM4},
+	{E1000_DEV_ID_PCH_SPT_I219_LM5},
+	{E1000_DEV_ID_PCH_CNP_I219_LM6},
+	{E1000_DEV_ID_PCH_CNP_I219_LM7},
+	{E1000_DEV_ID_PCH_ICP_I219_LM8},
+	{E1000_DEV_ID_PCH_ICP_I219_LM9},
+	{E1000_DEV_ID_PCH_CMP_I219_LM10},
+	{E1000_DEV_ID_PCH_CMP_I219_LM11},
+	{E1000_DEV_ID_PCH_CMP_I219_LM12},
+	{E1000_DEV_ID_PCH_TGP_I219_LM13},
+	{E1000_DEV_ID_PCH_TGP_I219_LM14},
+	{E1000_DEV_ID_PCH_TGP_I219_LM15},
+	{0}
+};
+
+static bool e1000e_check_me(u16 device_id)
+{
+	struct e1000e_me_supported *id;
+
+	for (id = (struct e1000e_me_supported *)me_supported;
+	     id->device_id; id++)
+		if (device_id == id->device_id)
+			return true;
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 /**
  * __ew32_prepare - prepare to write to MAC CSR register on certain parts
  * @hw: pointer to the HW structure
@@ -6916,7 +6955,8 @@ static int e1000e_pm_suspend(struct device *dev)
 		e1000e_pm_thaw(dev);
 
 	/* Introduce S0ix implementation */
-	if (hw->mac.type >= e1000_pch_cnp)
+	if (hw->mac.type >= e1000_pch_cnp &&
+	    !e1000e_check_me(hw->adapter->pdev->device))
 		e1000e_s0ix_entry_flow(adapter);
 
 	return rc;
@@ -6931,7 +6971,8 @@ static int e1000e_pm_resume(struct device *dev)
 	int rc;
 
 	/* Introduce S0ix implementation */
-	if (hw->mac.type >= e1000_pch_cnp)
+	if (hw->mac.type >= e1000_pch_cnp &&
+	    !e1000e_check_me(hw->adapter->pdev->device))
 		e1000e_s0ix_exit_flow(adapter);
 
 	rc = __e1000_resume(pdev);
-- 
2.26.2