netdev - [net-next 09/17] igc: Fix NFC rule validation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200523025109.3313635-10-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 22 May 2020 19:51:01 -0700
From:   Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        nhorman@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com,
        Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>,
        Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Subject: [net-next 09/17] igc: Fix NFC rule validation

From: Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@...el.com>

If we try to overwrite an existing rule with the same filter but
different action, we get EEXIST error as shown below.

$ ethtool -N eth0 flow-type ether dst <MACADDR> action 1 loc 10
$ ethtool -N eth0 flow-type ether dst <MACADDR> action 2 loc 10
rmgr: Cannot insert RX class rule: File exists

The second command is expected to overwrite the previous rule in location
10 and succeed.

This patch fixes igc_ethtool_check_nfc_rule() so it also checks the
rules location. In case they match, the rule under evaluation should not
be considered invalid.

Signed-off-by: Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@...el.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ethtool.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ethtool.c
index 43dff09a8f86..d14c46dce053 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ethtool.c
@@ -1225,8 +1225,8 @@ static void igc_ethtool_init_nfc_rule(struct igc_nfc_rule *rule,
  * Rules with both destination and source MAC addresses are considered invalid
  * since the driver doesn't support them.
  *
- * Also, if there is already another rule with the same filter, @rule is
- * considered invalid.
+ * Also, if there is already another rule with the same filter in a different
+ * location, @rule is considered invalid.
  *
  * Context: Expects adapter->nfc_rule_lock to be held by caller.
  *
@@ -1252,7 +1252,8 @@ static int igc_ethtool_check_nfc_rule(struct igc_adapter *adapter,
 
 	list_for_each_entry(tmp, &adapter->nfc_rule_list, list) {
 		if (!memcmp(&rule->filter, &tmp->filter,
-			    sizeof(rule->filter))) {
+			    sizeof(rule->filter)) &&
+		    tmp->location != rule->location) {
 			netdev_dbg(dev, "Rule already exists\n");
 			return -EEXIST;
 		}
-- 
2.26.2