lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 25 May 2020 13:57:46 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, derosier@...il.com,
        greearb@...delatech.com, jeyu@...nel.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, arnd@...db.de, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, aquini@...hat.com, cai@....pw, dyoung@...hat.com,
        bhe@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        gpiccoli@...onical.com, pmladek@...e.com, tiwai@...e.de,
        schlad@...e.de, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
        keescook@...omium.org, daniel.vetter@...ll.ch, will@...nel.org,
        mchehab+samsung@...nel.org, kvalo@...eaurora.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        ath10k@...ts.infradead.org, jiri@...nulli.us,
        briannorris@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] devlink: add simple fw crash helpers

On Fri, 22 May 2020 22:46:07 +0200 Johannes Berg wrote:
> > The irony is you have a problem with a networking device and all the
> > devices your initial set touched are networking. Two of the drivers 
> > you touched either have or will soon have devlink health reporters
> > implemented.  
> 
> Like I said above, do you think it'd be feasible to make a devcoredump
> out of devlink health reports? And can the report be in a way that we
> control the file format, or are there limits? I guess I should read the
> code to find out, but I figure you probably just know. But feel free to
> tell me to read it :)
> 
> The reason I'm asking is that it's starting to sound like we really
> ought to be implementing devlink, but we've got a bunch of
> infrastructure that uses the devcoredump, and it'll take time
> (significantly so) to change all that...

In devlink world pure FW core dumps are exposed by devlink regions.
An API allowing reading device memory, registers, etc., but also 
creating dumps of memory regions when things go wrong. It should be
a fairly straightforward migration.

Devlink health is more targeted, the dump is supposed to contain only
relevant information, selected and formatted by the driver. When device
misbehaves driver reads the relevant registers and FW state and creates
a formatted state dump. I believe each element of the dump must fit
into a netlink message (but there may be multiple elements, see
devlink_fmsg_prepare_skb()).

We should be able to convert dl-regions dumps and dl-health dumps into
devcoredumps, but since health reporters are supposed to be more
targeted there's usually multiple of them per device.

Conversely devcoredumps can be trivially exposed as dl-region dumps,
but I believe dl-health would require driver changes to format the
information appropriately.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists