[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200526002355.B2FAE20657@mail.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 00:23:55 +0000
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] e1000e: Do not wake up the system via WOL if device wakeup is disabled
Hi
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag
fixing commit: bc7f75fa9788 ("[E1000E]: New pci-express e1000 driver (currently for ICH9 devices only)").
The bot has tested the following trees: v5.6.14, v5.4.42, v4.19.124, v4.14.181, v4.9.224, v4.4.224.
v5.6.14: Build OK!
v5.4.42: Build OK!
v4.19.124: Build OK!
v4.14.181: Build OK!
v4.9.224: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
c8744f44aeae ("e1000e: Add Support for CannonLake")
v4.4.224: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
16ecba59bc33 ("e1000e: Do not read ICR in Other interrupt")
18dd23920703 ("e1000e: use BIT() macro for bit defines")
74f31299a41e ("e1000e: Increase PHY PLL clock gate timing")
c8744f44aeae ("e1000e: Add Support for CannonLake")
f3ed935de059 ("e1000e: initial support for i219-LM (3)")
NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.
How should we proceed with this patch?
--
Thanks
Sasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists