netdev - [PATCH 01/10] staging: wfx: drop unused variable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200526171821.934581-2-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 May 2020 19:18:12 +0200
From:   Jerome Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@...abs.com>
To:     devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jérôme Pouiller 
        <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>, kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] staging: wfx: drop unused variable

From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>

Since the commit 3f84adfe1d7ae ("staging: wfx: remove hack about tx_rate
policies"), the variable "count" is no more used in wfx_tx_policy_build().

Notice that there were two instances of the variable "count" in
wfx_tx_policy_build(). This patch also solves this cosmetic issue.

Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Fixes: 3f84adfe1d7ae ("staging: wfx: remove hack about tx_rate policies")
Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
---
 drivers/staging/wfx/data_tx.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/data_tx.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/data_tx.c
index a82f00f8f17bd..a9eddd6db2b5d 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/data_tx.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/data_tx.c
@@ -43,15 +43,10 @@ static void wfx_tx_policy_build(struct wfx_vif *wvif, struct tx_policy *policy,
 				struct ieee80211_tx_rate *rates)
 {
 	int i;
-	size_t count;
 	struct wfx_dev *wdev = wvif->wdev;
 
 	WARN(rates[0].idx < 0, "invalid rate policy");
 	memset(policy, 0, sizeof(*policy));
-	for (i = 1; i < IEEE80211_TX_MAX_RATES; i++)
-		if (rates[i].idx < 0)
-			break;
-	count = i;
 	for (i = 0; i < IEEE80211_TX_MAX_RATES; ++i) {
 		int rateid;
 		u8 count;
-- 
2.26.2