netdev - Re: [PATCH] mac80211_hwsim: report the WIPHY_FLAG_SUPPORTS_5_10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0131b3dbcb2f97b6a76ad5be0c50f26e11af1c5a.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:   Wed, 27 May 2020 09:54:13 +0200
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     Ramon Fontes <ramonreisfontes@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        kvalo@...eaurora.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211_hwsim: report the WIPHY_FLAG_SUPPORTS_5_10_MHZ
 capability

On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 08:36 -0300, Ramon Fontes wrote:
> > Not sure this is enough? How about wmediumd, for example?
> 
> It works with wmediumd too. At least I was able to enable 5 / 10MHz
> via iw with 5.9GHz

Yeah, but wmediumd won't know that it's not 20 MHz, I guess :-)

> > And also, 5/10 MHz has many more channels inbetween the normal ones, no?
> > Shouldn't those also be added?
> 
> Tested with 5855MHz - 5925MHz

Yeah, but which channels? I believe with 10 MHz you can also use channel
175, for example, which doesn't exist in 20 MHz channelization.

Anyway, I've applied it now, we can fix more later.

johannes