netdev - [PATCH] can: mcp251x: add support for half duplex controllers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1590679677-2678-1-git-send-email-tharvey@gateworks.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 May 2020 08:27:57 -0700
From:   Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>
To:     Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
        Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sean Nyekjaer <sean@...nix.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Timo Schlüßler <schluessler@...use.de>,
        "Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
        Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>
Subject: [PATCH] can: mcp251x: add support for half duplex controllers

Some SPI host controllers do not support full-duplex SPI and are
marked as such via the SPI_CONTROLLER_HALF_DUPLEX controller flag.

For such controllers use half duplex transactions but retain full
duplex transactions for the controllers that can handle those.

Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>
---
 drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251x.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251x.c b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251x.c
index 5009ff2..203ef20 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251x.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251x.c
@@ -290,8 +290,12 @@ static u8 mcp251x_read_reg(struct spi_device *spi, u8 reg)
 	priv->spi_tx_buf[0] = INSTRUCTION_READ;
 	priv->spi_tx_buf[1] = reg;
 
-	mcp251x_spi_trans(spi, 3);
-	val = priv->spi_rx_buf[2];
+	if (spi->controller->flags & SPI_CONTROLLER_HALF_DUPLEX) {
+		spi_write_then_read(spi, priv->spi_tx_buf, 2, &val, 1);
+	} else {
+		mcp251x_spi_trans(spi, 3);
+		val = priv->spi_rx_buf[2];
+	}
 
 	return val;
 }
@@ -303,10 +307,18 @@ static void mcp251x_read_2regs(struct spi_device *spi, u8 reg, u8 *v1, u8 *v2)
 	priv->spi_tx_buf[0] = INSTRUCTION_READ;
 	priv->spi_tx_buf[1] = reg;
 
-	mcp251x_spi_trans(spi, 4);
+	if (spi->controller->flags & SPI_CONTROLLER_HALF_DUPLEX) {
+		u8 val[2] = { 0 };
 
-	*v1 = priv->spi_rx_buf[2];
-	*v2 = priv->spi_rx_buf[3];
+		spi_write_then_read(spi, priv->spi_tx_buf, 2, val, 2);
+		*v1 = val[0];
+		*v2 = val[1];
+	} else {
+		mcp251x_spi_trans(spi, 4);
+
+		*v1 = priv->spi_rx_buf[2];
+		*v2 = priv->spi_rx_buf[3];
+	}
 }
 
 static void mcp251x_write_reg(struct spi_device *spi, u8 reg, u8 val)
@@ -409,8 +421,16 @@ static void mcp251x_hw_rx_frame(struct spi_device *spi, u8 *buf,
 			buf[i] = mcp251x_read_reg(spi, RXBCTRL(buf_idx) + i);
 	} else {
 		priv->spi_tx_buf[RXBCTRL_OFF] = INSTRUCTION_READ_RXB(buf_idx);
-		mcp251x_spi_trans(spi, SPI_TRANSFER_BUF_LEN);
-		memcpy(buf, priv->spi_rx_buf, SPI_TRANSFER_BUF_LEN);
+		if (spi->controller->flags & SPI_CONTROLLER_HALF_DUPLEX) {
+			spi_write_then_read(spi, priv->spi_tx_buf, 1,
+					    priv->spi_rx_buf,
+					    SPI_TRANSFER_BUF_LEN);
+			memcpy(buf + 1, priv->spi_rx_buf,
+			       SPI_TRANSFER_BUF_LEN - 1);
+		} else {
+			mcp251x_spi_trans(spi, SPI_TRANSFER_BUF_LEN);
+			memcpy(buf, priv->spi_rx_buf, SPI_TRANSFER_BUF_LEN);
+		}
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.7.4