netdev - Re: [PATCH 12/23] bpf: handle the compat string in bpf_trace_copy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 28 May 2020 06:39:57 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, x86@...nel.org,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/23] bpf: handle the compat string in
 bpf_trace_copy_string better

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 07:26:30PM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
>> --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c~xxx
>> +++ a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
>> @@ -588,15 +588,22 @@ BPF_CALL_5(bpf_seq_printf, struct seq_fi
>>   		}
>>     		if (fmt[i] == 's') {
>> +			void *unsafe_ptr;
>> +
>>   			/* try our best to copy */
>>   			if (memcpy_cnt >= MAX_SEQ_PRINTF_MAX_MEMCPY) {
>>   				err = -E2BIG;
>>   				goto out;
>>   			}
>>   -			err = strncpy_from_unsafe(bufs->buf[memcpy_cnt],
>> -						  (void *) (long) args[fmt_cnt],
>> -						  MAX_SEQ_PRINTF_STR_LEN);
>> +			unsafe_ptr = (void *)(long)args[fmt_cnt];
>> +			if ((unsigned long)unsafe_ptr < TASK_SIZE) {
>> +				err = strncpy_from_user_nofault(
>> +					bufs->buf[memcpy_cnt], unsafe_ptr,
>> +					MAX_SEQ_PRINTF_STR_LEN);
>> +			} else {
>> +				err = -EFAULT;
>> +			}
>
> This probably not right.
> The pointer stored at args[fmt_cnt] is a kernel pointer,
> but it could be an invalid address and we do not want to fault.
> Not sure whether it exists or not, we should use 
> strncpy_from_kernel_nofault()?

If you know it is a kernel pointer with this series it should be
strncpy_from_kernel_nofault.  But even before the series it should have
been strncpy_from_unsafe_strict.