[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pnant8nz.fsf@mellanox.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 11:03:28 +0200
From: Petr Machata <petrm@...lanox.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Amit Cohen <amitc@...lanox.com>, mlxsw <mlxsw@...lanox.com>,
"netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"o.rempel\@pengutronix.de" <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: Link down reasons
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> writes:
> It is called downshift. And we have support for it in the phylib core,
> if the PHY has the needed vendor register.
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.7-rc7/source/drivers/net/phy/phy-core.c#L341
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.7-rc7/source/drivers/net/phy/phy.c#L95
Thanks for the references.
> So in theory we could report:
>
> Link detected: yes (downshifted)
>
> Assuming your proposed API support a reason why it is up, not just a
> reason why it is down?
Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz> writes:
> Perhaps we could use more general name than "link down reason", e.g.
> "extended state", and it could be reported even if the link is still up
All right, that makes sense to me. Let's make it extended state.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists