lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 29 May 2020 14:16:02 +0200
From:   Jerome Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@...abs.com>
To:     devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jérôme Pouiller 
        <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] staging: wfx: fix AC priority

From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>

In order to work properly all the queues of the device must be filled (the
device chooses itself the queue to use depending of AC parameters and
other things). It is the job of wfx_tx_queues_get_skb() to choose which
queue must be filled. However, the sorting algorithm was inverted, so it
prioritized the already filled queue! Consequently, the AC priorities was
badly broken.

Fixes: 6bf418c50f98a ("staging: wfx: change the way to choose frame to send")
Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
---
 drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c
index 3248ecefda564..75df4aca29ac3 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *wfx_tx_queues_get_skb(struct wfx_dev *wdev)
 	for (i = 0; i < IEEE80211_NUM_ACS; i++) {
 		sorted_queues[i] = &wdev->tx_queue[i];
 		for (j = i; j > 0; j--)
-			if (atomic_read(&sorted_queues[j]->pending_frames) >
+			if (atomic_read(&sorted_queues[j]->pending_frames) <
 			    atomic_read(&sorted_queues[j - 1]->pending_frames))
 				swap(sorted_queues[j - 1], sorted_queues[j]);
 	}
-- 
2.26.2

Powered by blists - more mailing lists