[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200529131631.285351a5@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 13:16:31 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 10/11] net/mlx5e: kTLS, Add kTLS RX resync support
On Fri, 29 May 2020 12:46:40 -0700 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> /* Re-sync */
> +static struct mlx5_wqe_ctrl_seg *
> +resync_post_get_progress_params(struct mlx5e_icosq *sq,
> + struct mlx5e_ktls_offload_context_rx *priv_rx)
> +{
> + struct mlx5e_ktls_rx_resync_ctx *resync = &priv_rx->resync;
> + struct mlx5e_get_tls_progress_params_wqe *wqe;
> + struct mlx5_wqe_ctrl_seg *cseg;
> + struct mlx5_seg_get_psv *psv;
> + u16 pi;
> +
> + dma_sync_single_for_device(resync->priv->mdev->device,
> + resync->dma_addr,
> + PROGRESS_PARAMS_PADDED_SIZE,
> + DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(MLX5E_KTLS_GET_PROGRESS_WQEBBS != 1);
> + if (unlikely(!mlx5e_wqc_has_room_for(&sq->wq, sq->cc, sq->pc, 1)))
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
I thought you said that resync requests are guaranteed to never fail?
> + pi = mlx5e_icosq_get_next_pi(sq, 1);
> + wqe = MLX5E_TLS_FETCH_GET_PROGRESS_PARAMS_WQE(sq, pi);
> +
> +#define GET_PSV_DS_CNT (DIV_ROUND_UP(sizeof(*wqe), MLX5_SEND_WQE_DS))
> +
> + cseg = &wqe->ctrl;
> + cseg->opmod_idx_opcode =
> + cpu_to_be32((sq->pc << 8) | MLX5_OPCODE_GET_PSV |
> + (MLX5_OPC_MOD_TLS_TIR_PROGRESS_PARAMS << 24));
> + cseg->qpn_ds =
> + cpu_to_be32((sq->sqn << MLX5_WQE_CTRL_QPN_SHIFT) | GET_PSV_DS_CNT);
> +
> + psv = &wqe->psv;
> + psv->num_psv = 1 << 4;
> + psv->l_key = sq->channel->mkey_be;
> + psv->psv_index[0] = cpu_to_be32(priv_rx->tirn);
> + psv->va = cpu_to_be64(priv_rx->resync.dma_addr);
> +
> + icosq_fill_wi(sq, pi, MLX5E_ICOSQ_WQE_GET_PSV_TLS, 1, priv_rx);
> + sq->pc++;
> +
> + return cseg;
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists