[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200529234309.484480-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 16:43:07 -0700
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] vhost, docs: convert to pin_user_pages(), new "case 5"
Hi,
It recently became clear to me that there are some get_user_pages*()
callers that don't fit neatly into any of the four cases that are so
far listed in pin_user_pages.rst. vhost.c is one of those.
Add a Case 5 to the documentation, and refer to that when converting
vhost.c.
Thanks to Jan Kara for helping me (again) in understanding the
interaction between get_user_pages() and page writeback [1].
This is based on today's mmotm, which has a nearby patch to
pin_user_pages.rst that rewords cases 3 and 4.
Note that I have only compile-tested the vhost.c patch, although that
does also include cross-compiling for a few other arches. Any run-time
testing would be greatly appreciated.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200529070343.GL14550@quack2.suse.cz
John Hubbard (2):
docs: mm/gup: pin_user_pages.rst: add a "case 5"
vhost: convert get_user_pages() --> pin_user_pages()
Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 5 ++---
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists