[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200530122105.GM2491@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 09:21:05 -0300
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To: wenxu@...oud.cn
Cc: paulb@...lanox.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/sched: act_ct: add nat mangle action only for
NAT-conntrack
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 01:54:51PM +0800, wenxu@...oud.cn wrote:
> From: wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>
>
> Currently add nat mangle action with comparing invert and ori tuple.
Nit, "orig" ---^
> It is better to check IPS_NAT_MASK flags first to avoid non necessary
> memcmp for non-NAT conntrack.
>
> Signed-off-by: wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
> ---
> net/sched/act_ct.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/act_ct.c b/net/sched/act_ct.c
> index 1a76639..2057735 100644
> --- a/net/sched/act_ct.c
> +++ b/net/sched/act_ct.c
> @@ -199,6 +199,9 @@ static int tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat(struct net *net,
> const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *tuple = &ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple;
> struct nf_conntrack_tuple target;
>
> + if (!(ct->status & IPS_NAT_MASK))
> + return 0;
> +
> nf_ct_invert_tuple(&target, &ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple);
>
> switch (tuple->src.l3num) {
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists