netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/1] wireguard column reformatting for end of cycle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 1 Jun 2020 15:12:49 -0600
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/1] wireguard column reformatting for end of cycle

Hi Dave,

On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 2:56 PM David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> Jason, I'm not discussing this.
>
> I have to backport these fixes and it makes more work for me, as well
> as others.

As I said earlier, no problem, and I understand.

> I'm also quite sad that the most important thing you could find to
> work on was figuring out how many columns should be in a line.

That seems kind of uncalled for, don't you think? But I guess I'll
take the bait: this is very much not the only thing I've been working
on, far from it in fact. There was a small window between Linus
committing the 100 column patch and net-next closing, so I took a
break from other things to make sure this at least had a shot. Turns
out that the backporting concern was paramount, which is completely
understandable, and now I'll continue on my way working on the stuff
that I resumed last night after sending this patch.

Jason