[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200601223146.bghhao75rzpdk3kx@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 15:31:46 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 0/5] bpf: Add support for XDP programs in
DEVMAP entries
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 04:28:02PM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 6/1/20 3:12 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > In patch 5 I had to fix:
> > /data/users/ast/net-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_devmap_attach.c:
> > In function ‘test_neg_xdp_devmap_helpers’:
> > /data/users/ast/net-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h:106:3:
> > warning: ‘duration’ may be used uninitialized in this function
> > [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> > 106 | fprintf(stdout, "%s:PASS:%s %d nsec\n", \
> > | ^~~~~~~
> > /data/users/ast/net-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_devmap_attach.c:79:8:
> > note: ‘duration’ was declared here
> > 79 | __u32 duration;
>
> What compiler version? it compiles cleanly with ubuntu 20.04 and gcc
> 9.3. The other prog_tests are inconsistent with initializing it.
official rhel's devtoolset-9
gcc version 9.1.1 20190605 (Red Hat 9.1.1-2) (GCC)
> >
> > and that selftest is imo too primitive.
>
> I focused the selftests on API changes introduced by this set - new
> attach type, valid accesses to egress_ifindex and not allowing devmap
> programs with xdp generic.
>
> > It's only loading progs and not executing them.
> > Could you please add prog_test_run to it?
> >
>
> I will look into it.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists