lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 2 Jun 2020 12:33:11 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Danielle Ratson <danieller@...lanox.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        michael.chan@...adcom.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
        saeedm@...lanox.com, leon@...nel.org, jiri@...lanox.com,
        idosch@...lanox.com, snelson@...sando.io, drivers@...sando.io,
        andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/8] Expose devlink port attributes

On Tue,  2 Jun 2020 14:31:11 +0300 Danielle Ratson wrote:
> Currently, user has no way of knowing if a port can be split and into
> how many ports.
> 
> Among other things, it is currently impossible to write generic tests
> for port split.
> 
> In order to be able to expose the information regarding the split
> capability to user space, set the required attributes and pass them to
> netlink.
> 
> Patch 1: Move set attribute from devlink_port_attrs to devlink_port.
> Patch 2: Move switch_port attribute from devlink_port_attrs to devlink_port
> Patch 3: Replace devlink_port_attrs_set parameters with a struct.
> Patch 4: Set and initialize lanes attribute in the driver.
> Patch 5: Add lanes attribute to devlink port and pass to netlink.
> Patch 6: Set and initialize splittable attribute in the driver.
> Patch 7: Add splittable attribute to devlink port and pass them to netlink.
> Patch 8: Add a split port test.

Since we have the splitability and number of lanes now understood by
the core - can the code also start doing more input checking?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ