lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200603161237.GA26729@orolia.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 Jun 2020 18:12:37 +0200
From:   Olivier Dautricourt <olivier.dautricourt@...lia.com>
To:     Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc:     Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: stmmac: Support coarse mode through ioctl

The 05/26/2020 20:55, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:28:08PM +0200, Olivier Dautricourt wrote:
> > The required time adjustment is written in the Timestamp Update registers
> > while the Sub-second increment register is programmed with the period
> > of the clock, which is the precision of our correction.
> 
> I don't see in this patch where the "required time adjustment is
> written in the Timestamp Update registers".
> 
> What am I missing?
> 
> Thanks,
> Richard

This routine already exists in the driver (adjust_systime function).
This one is called on ADJ_SETOFFSET in both functionning modes.
So in both modes the phase jump is done by setting the target time in those
update registers, set a flag and waiting for this flag to be cleared, that
would mean that the correction is effective.


Regards,
-- 
Olivier Dautricourt

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ