[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200604103815.GE28263@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 12:38:15 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: dwilder <dwilder@...ibm.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, wilder@...ibm.com,
mkubecek@...e.com
Subject: Re: [(RFC) PATCH ] NULL pointer dereference on rmmod iptable_mangle.
dwilder <dwilder@...ibm.com> wrote:
> > Since the netns core already does an unconditional synchronize_rcu after
> > the pre_exit hooks this would avoid the problem as well.
>
> Something like this? (un-tested)
Yes.
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_mangle.c
> b/net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_mangle.c
> index bb9266ea3785..0d448e4d5213 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_mangle.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_mangle.c
> @@ -100,15 +100,26 @@ static int __net_init iptable_mangle_table_init(struct
> net *net)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static void __net_exit iptable_mangle_net_pre_exit(struct net *net)
> +{
> + struct xt_table *table = net->ipv4.iptable_mangle;
> +
> + if (mangle_ops)
> + nf_unregister_net_hooks(net, mangle_ops,
> + hweight32(table->valid_hooks));
> +}
You probably need if (table) here, not mangle_ops.
I'm not sure if it makes sense to add a new
xt_unregister_table_hook() helper, I guess one would have to try
and see if that reduces copy&paste programming or not.
> static void __net_exit iptable_mangle_net_exit(struct net *net)
> {
> if (!net->ipv4.iptable_mangle)
> return;
> - ipt_unregister_table(net, net->ipv4.iptable_mangle, mangle_ops);
> + ipt_unregister_table(net, net->ipv4.iptable_mangle, NULL);
I guess the 3rd arg could be removed from the helper.
But yes, this looks like what I had in mind.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists