[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200605164938.GH37466@atomide.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 09:49:38 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@...il.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@...il.com>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>,
Maital Hahn <maitalm@...com>,
Fuqian Huang <huangfq.daxian@...il.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, emamd001@....edu, wu000273@....edu,
kjlu@....edu, smccaman@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wlcore: mesh: handle failure case of pm_runtime_get_sync
* Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@...il.com> [200605 03:28]:
> Calling pm_runtime_get_sync increments the counter even in case of
> failure, causing incorrect ref count. Call pm_runtime_put if
> pm_runtime_get_sync fails.
Looks like we have a similar patch already in Linux next,
care to check?
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists