lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANFp7mWHX15oJAe_RgYbN+sHbPXmUYkYtvT9V0oszOc0Y=7TKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 Jun 2020 21:29:30 -0700
From:   Abhishek Pandit-Subedi <abhishekpandit@...omium.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
        Todd Brandt <todd.e.brandt@...ux.intel.com>,
        Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
        "open list:BLUETOOTH DRIVERS" <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
        ChromeOS Bluetooth Upstreaming 
        <chromeos-bluetooth-upstreaming@...omium.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: Allow suspend even when preparation has failed

Sent a v2 with proper fixes and reported-by tags.

Thanks
Abhishek

On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 3:46 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 10:22 PM Abhishek Pandit-Subedi
> <abhishekpandit@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > It is preferable to allow suspend even when Bluetooth has problems
> > preparing for sleep. When Bluetooth fails to finish preparing for
> > suspend, log the error and allow the suspend notifier to continue
> > instead.
> >
> > To also make it clearer why suspend failed, change bt_dev_dbg to
> > bt_dev_err when handling the suspend timeout.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Abhishek Pandit-Subedi <abhishekpandit@...omium.org>
>
> Thanks for the patch, it looks reasonable to me.
>
> It would be good to add a Fixes tag to it to indicate that it works
> around an issue introduced by an earlier commit.
>
> Len, Todd, would it be possible to test this one on the affected machines?
>
> > ---
> > To verify this is properly working, I added an additional change to
> > hci_suspend_wait_event to always return -16. This validates that suspend
> > continues even when an error has occurred during the suspend
> > preparation.
> >
> > Example on Chromebook:
> > [   55.834524] PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
> > [   55.841930] PM: Preparing system for sleep (s2idle)
> > [   55.940492] Bluetooth: hci_core.c:hci_suspend_notifier() hci0: Suspend notifier action (3) failed: -16
> > [   55.940497] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.001 seconds) done.
> > [   55.941692] OOM killer disabled.
> > [   55.941693] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.000 seconds) done.
> > [   55.942632] PM: Suspending system (s2idle)
> >
> > I ran this through a suspend_stress_test in the following scenarios:
> > * Peer classic device connected: 50+ suspends
> > * No devices connected: 100 suspends
> > * With the above test case returning -EBUSY: 50 suspends
> >
> > I also ran this through our automated testing for suspend and wake on
> > BT from suspend continues to work.
> >
> >
> >  net/bluetooth/hci_core.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
> > index dbe2d79f233fba..54da48441423e0 100644
> > --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
> > +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
> > @@ -3289,10 +3289,10 @@ static int hci_suspend_wait_event(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> >                                      WAKE_COND, SUSPEND_NOTIFIER_TIMEOUT);
> >
> >         if (ret == 0) {
> > -               bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "Timed out waiting for suspend");
> > +               bt_dev_err(hdev, "Timed out waiting for suspend events");
> >                 for (i = 0; i < __SUSPEND_NUM_TASKS; ++i) {
> >                         if (test_bit(i, hdev->suspend_tasks))
> > -                               bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "Bit %d is set", i);
> > +                               bt_dev_err(hdev, "Suspend timeout bit: %d", i);
> >                         clear_bit(i, hdev->suspend_tasks);
> >                 }
> >
> > @@ -3360,12 +3360,15 @@ static int hci_suspend_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
> >                 ret = hci_change_suspend_state(hdev, BT_RUNNING);
> >         }
> >
> > -       /* If suspend failed, restore it to running */
> > -       if (ret && action == PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE)
> > -               hci_change_suspend_state(hdev, BT_RUNNING);
> > -
> >  done:
> > -       return ret ? notifier_from_errno(-EBUSY) : NOTIFY_STOP;
> > +       /* We always allow suspend even if suspend preparation failed and
> > +        * attempt to recover in resume.
> > +        */
> > +       if (ret)
> > +               bt_dev_err(hdev, "Suspend notifier action (%x) failed: %d",
> > +                          action, ret);
> > +
> > +       return NOTIFY_STOP;
> >  }
> >
> >  /* Alloc HCI device */
> > --
> > 2.27.0.rc2.251.g90737beb825-goog
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ