netdev - Re: [PATCHv4 bpf-next 0/2] xdp: add dev map multicast support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200605062606.GO102436@dhcp-12-153.nay.redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 5 Jun 2020 14:26:06 +0800
From:   Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To:     Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>, ast@...nel.org,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 bpf-next 0/2] xdp: add dev map multicast support

On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 06:02:54PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 02:37:23PM +0200, Toke HÃƒÂ¸iland-JÃƒÂ¸rgensen wrote:
> >> > Now I use the ethtool_stats.pl to count forwarding speed and here is the result:
> >> >
> >> > With kernel 5.7(ingress i40e, egress i40e)
> >> > XDP:
> >> > bridge: 1.8M PPS
> >> > xdp_redirect_map:
> >> >   generic mode: 1.9M PPS
> >> >   driver mode: 10.4M PPS
> >> 
> >> Ah, now we're getting somewhere! :)
> >> 
> >> > Kernel 5.7 + my patch(ingress i40e, egress i40e)
> >> > bridge: 1.8M
> >> > xdp_redirect_map:
> >> >   generic mode: 1.86M PPS
> >> >   driver mode: 10.17M PPS
> >> 
> >> Right, so this corresponds to a ~2ns overhead (10**9/10400000 -
> >> 10**9/10170000). This is not too far from being in the noise, I suppose;
> >> is the difference consistent?
> >
> > Sorry, I didn't get, what different consistent do you mean?
> 
> I meant, how much do the numbers vary between each test run?

Oh, when run it at the same period, the number is stable, the range is about
~0.05M PPS. But after a long time or reboot, the speed may changed a little.
Here is the new test result after I reboot the system:

Kernel 5.7 + my patch(ingress i40e, egress i40e)
xdp_redirect_map:
  generic mode: 1.9M PPS
  driver mode: 10.2M PPS

xdp_redirect_map_multi:
  generic mode: 1.58M PPS
  driver mode: 7.16M PPS

Kernel 5.7 + my patch(ingress i40e, egress i40e + veth(No XDP on peer))
xdp_redirect_map:
  generic mode: 2.2M PPS
  driver mode: 14.2M PPS

xdp_redirect_map_multi:
  generic mode: 1.6M PPS
  driver mode: 9.9M PPS

Kernel 5.7 + my patch(ingress i40e, egress i40e + veth(with XDP_DROP on peer))
xdp_redirect_map:
  generic mode: 1.6M PPS
  driver mode: 13.6M PPS

xdp_redirect_map_multi:
  generic mode: 1.3M PPS
  driver mode: 8.7M PPS

Kernel 5.7 + my patch(ingress i40e, egress i40e + veth(No XDP on peer))
xdp_redirect_map_multi:
  generic mode: 1.15M PPS
  driver mode: 3.48M PPS

Kernel 5.7 + my patch(ingress i40e, egress i40e + veth(with XDP_DROP on peer))
xdp_redirect_map_multi:
  generic mode: 0.98M PPS
  driver mode: 3.15M PPS

This time the number looks more reasonable.

Thanks
Hangbin