netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC] uaccess: user_access_begin_after_access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55b50859-a71b-c57e-e26b-5fc8659eac22@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 5 Jun 2020 18:03:38 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] uaccess: user_access_begin_after_access_ok()


On 2020/6/5 上午12:49, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> 2. Second argument to translate_desc is a GPA, isn't it?
>> No, it's IOVA, this function will be called only when IOTLB is enabled.
>>
>> Thanks
> Right IOVA. Point stands how does it make sense to cast
> a userspace pointer to an IOVA? I guess it's just
> because it's talking to qemu actually, so it's abusing
> the notation a bit ...
>

Yes, but the issues are:

1) VHOST_SET_VRING_ADDR is used for iotlb and !iotlb
2) so did the memory accessors

Unless we differ separate IOTLB datapath out, there's probably not easy 
to have another notation.

Thanks