[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200607164759.GG1022955@lunn.ch>
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2020 18:47:59 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Amit Cohen <amitc@...lanox.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
corbet@....net, jiri@...lanox.com, idosch@...lanox.com,
shuah@...nel.org, mkubecek@...e.cz, gustavo@...eddedor.com,
cforno12@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
linux@...pel-privat.de, alexandru.ardelean@...log.com,
ayal@...lanox.com, petrm@...lanox.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com,
liuhangbin@...il.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 05/10] Documentation: networking:
ethtool-netlink: Add link extended state
> +Link extended states:
> +
> + ============================ =============================================
> + ``Autoneg failure`` Failure during auto negotiation mechanism
I think you need to define 'failure' here.
Linux PHYs don't have this state. auto-neg is either ongoing, or has
completed. There is no time limit for auto-neg. If there is no link
partner, auto-neg does not fail, it just continues until there is a
link partner which responds and negotiation completes.
Looking at the state diagrams in 802.3 clause 28, what do you consider
as failure?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists