netdev - Re: [PATCH 03/12] x86/xen: Introduce new function to map HYPERVISOR_shared

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <311de66b-68fb-f9f3-910e-6fa5eeb648bb@oracle.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 Jun 2020 14:49:54 -0400
From:   Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To:     Anchal Agarwal <anchalag@...zon.com>
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com,
        x86@...nel.org, jgross@...e.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, kamatam@...zon.com, sstabellini@...nel.org,
        konrad.wilk@...cle.com, roger.pau@...rix.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
        davem@...emloft.net, rjw@...ysocki.net, len.brown@...el.com,
        pavel@....cz, peterz@...radead.org, eduval@...zon.com,
        sblbir@...zon.com, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
        vkuznets@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dwmw@...zon.co.uk,
        benh@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] x86/xen: Introduce new function to map
 HYPERVISOR_shared_info on Resume

On 6/8/20 12:52 PM, Anchal Agarwal wrote:
>
>>>>> +void xen_hvm_map_shared_info(void)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +     xen_hvm_init_shared_info();
>>>>> +     if (shared_info_pfn)
>>>>> +             HYPERVISOR_shared_info = __va(PFN_PHYS(shared_info_pfn));
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>> AFAICT it is only called once so I don't see a need for new routine.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> HYPERVISOR_shared_info can only be mapped in this scope without refactoring
>>> much of the code.
>>
>> Refactoring what? All am suggesting is
>>
> shared_info_pfn does not seem to be in scope here, it's scope is limited
> to enlighten_hvm.c. That's the reason I introduced a new function there.


OK, that's a good point.


-boris