netdev - Re: [PATCH ethtool v1] netlink: add master/slave configuration support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200609.113633.1866761141966326637.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Tue, 09 Jun 2020 11:36:33 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     stephen@...workplumber.org
Cc:     o.rempel@...gutronix.de, andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        hkallweit1@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org, corbet@....net,
        mkubecek@...e.cz, linville@...driver.com, david@...tonic.nl,
        kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk, mkl@...gutronix.de,
        marex@...x.de, christian.herber@....com, amitc@...lanox.com,
        petrm@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH ethtool v1] netlink: add master/slave configuration
 support

From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 10:19:35 -0700

> Yes, words do matter and convey a lot of implied connotation and
> meaning.

What is your long term plan?  Will you change all of the UAPI for
bonding for example?

Or will we have a partial solution to the problem?