netdev - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.6 222/606] net sched: fix reporting the first-time use timestamp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200608231211.3363633-222-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon,  8 Jun 2020 19:05:47 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Roman Mashak <mrv@...atatu.com>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.6 222/606] net sched: fix reporting the first-time use timestamp

From: Roman Mashak <mrv@...atatu.com>

[ Upstream commit b15e62631c5f19fea9895f7632dae9c1b27fe0cd ]

When a new action is installed, firstuse field of 'tcf_t' is explicitly set
to 0. Value of zero means "new action, not yet used"; as a packet hits the
action, 'firstuse' is stamped with the current jiffies value.

tcf_tm_dump() should return 0 for firstuse if action has not yet been hit.

Fixes: 48d8ee1694dd ("net sched actions: aggregate dumping of actions timeinfo")
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Signed-off-by: Roman Mashak <mrv@...atatu.com>
Acked-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 include/net/act_api.h | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/net/act_api.h b/include/net/act_api.h
index 71347a90a9d1..050c0246dee8 100644
--- a/include/net/act_api.h
+++ b/include/net/act_api.h
@@ -69,7 +69,8 @@ static inline void tcf_tm_dump(struct tcf_t *dtm, const struct tcf_t *stm)
 {
 	dtm->install = jiffies_to_clock_t(jiffies - stm->install);
 	dtm->lastuse = jiffies_to_clock_t(jiffies - stm->lastuse);
-	dtm->firstuse = jiffies_to_clock_t(jiffies - stm->firstuse);
+	dtm->firstuse = stm->firstuse ?
+		jiffies_to_clock_t(jiffies - stm->firstuse) : 0;
 	dtm->expires = jiffies_to_clock_t(stm->expires);
 }
 
-- 
2.25.1