[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202006101245.DED83052@keescook>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 12:45:33 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Use __scm_install_fd() more widely
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 11:38:00AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 10:03:03 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
> > If 0-day doesn't kick anything back on this tree, I'll resend the
> > series...
>
> Well, 0-day may find more, but I can already tell you that patch 1 has
> a checkpatch error:
>
> ERROR: "(foo*)" should be "(foo *)"
> #149: FILE: net/core/scm.c:323:
> + (__force struct cmsghdr __user*)msg->msg_control;
>
> total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 131 lines checked
>
> And patch 2 makes W=1 builds unhappy:
>
> net/core/scm.c:292: warning: Function parameter or member 'file' not described in '__scm_install_fd'
> net/core/scm.c:292: warning: Function parameter or member 'ufd' not described in '__scm_install_fd'
> net/core/scm.c:292: warning: Function parameter or member 'o_flags' not described in '__scm_install_fd'
Yeah, there are a few more problems too. I'll get it nailed down
hopefully this week and send a v2.
Thanks for looking at it!
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists