lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200610091328.evddgipbedykwaq6@lion.mk-sys.cz>
Date:   Wed, 10 Jun 2020 11:13:28 +0200
From:   Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
To:     Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ethtool 5.7: netlink ENOENT error when setting WOL

On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 10:52:26AM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 10.06.2020 10:26, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> > Since ethtool 5.7 following happens (kernel is latest linux-next):
> > 
> > ethtool -s enp3s0 wol g
> > netlink error: No such file or directory
> > 
> > With ethtool 5.6 this doesn't happen. I also checked the latest ethtool
> > git version (5.7 + some fixes), error still occurs.
> > 
> > Heiner
> > 
> Bisecting points to:
> netlink: show netlink error even without extack

Just to make sure you are hitting the same problem I'm just looking at,
please check if

- your kernel is built with ETHTOOL_NETLINK=n
- the command actually succeeds (i.e. changes the WoL modes)
- output with of "ethtool --debug 0x12 -s enp3s0 wol g" looks like

  sending genetlink packet (32 bytes):
      msg length 32 genl-ctrl
      CTRL_CMD_GETFAMILY
          CTRL_ATTR_FAMILY_NAME = "ethtool"
  received genetlink packet (52 bytes):
      msg length 52 error errno=-2
  netlink error: No such file or directory
  offending message:
      ETHTOOL_MSG_LINKINFO_SET
          ETHTOOL_A_LINKINFO_PORT = 101

If this is the case, than the commit found by bisect only revealed an
issue which was introduced earlier by commit 76bdf9372824 ("netlink: use
pretty printing for ethtool netlink messages"). The patch below should
suppress the message as intended.

Michal

diff --git a/netlink/nlsock.c b/netlink/nlsock.c
index 2c760b770ec5..c3f09b6ee9ab 100644
--- a/netlink/nlsock.c
+++ b/netlink/nlsock.c
@@ -255,12 +255,12 @@ int nlsock_process_reply(struct nl_socket *nlsk, mnl_cb_t reply_cb, void *data)
 
 		nlhdr = (struct nlmsghdr *)buff;
 		if (nlhdr->nlmsg_type == NLMSG_ERROR) {
-			bool silent = nlsk->nlctx->suppress_nlerr;
+			unsigned int suppress = nlsk->nlctx->suppress_nlerr;
 			bool pretty;
 
 			pretty = debug_on(nlsk->nlctx->ctx->debug,
 					  DEBUG_NL_PRETTY_MSG);
-			return nlsock_process_ack(nlhdr, len, silent, pretty);
+			return nlsock_process_ack(nlhdr, len, suppress, pretty);
 		}
 
 		msgbuff->nlhdr = nlhdr;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ