[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <76b14132-407a-48bf-c4d5-9d0b2c700bb0@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 11:02:57 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
eperezma@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v6 02/11] vhost: use batched get_vq_desc version
On 2020/6/10 下午7:05, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_get_vq_desc);
>>> /* Reverse the effect of vhost_get_vq_desc. Useful for error handling. */
>>> void vhost_discard_vq_desc(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, int n)
>>> {
>>> + unfetch_descs(vq);
>>> vq->last_avail_idx -= n;
>> So unfetch_descs() has decreased last_avail_idx.
>> Can we fix this by letting unfetch_descs() return the number and then we can
>> do:
>>
>> int d = unfetch_descs(vq);
>> vq->last_avail_idx -= (n > d) ? n - d: 0;
>>
>> Thanks
> That's intentional I think - we need both.
Yes, but:
>
> Unfetch_descs drops the descriptors in the cache that were
> *not returned to caller* through get_vq_desc.
>
> vhost_discard_vq_desc drops the ones that were returned through get_vq_desc.
>
> Did I miss anything?
We could count some descriptors twice, consider the case e.g we only
cache on descriptor:
fetch_descs()
fetch_buf()
last_avail_idx++;
Then we want do discard it:
vhost_discard_avail_buf(1)
unfetch_descs()
last_avail_idx--;
last_avail_idx -= 1;
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists