[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1591846217-3514-1-git-send-email-wenxu@ucloud.cn>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 11:30:16 +0800
From: wenxu@...oud.cn
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, pablo@...filter.org
Subject: [PATCH net 1/2] flow_offload: fix incorrect cb_priv check for flow_block_cb
From: wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>
The cb_priv in the flow_indr_dev_unregister get from the driver
is the same as cb_priv of flow_indr_dev. But it always isn't
the same as cb_priv of flow_block_cb which leads miss cleanup operation.
For mlx5e example the cb_priv of flow_indr_dev is the mlx5e_rep_priv
which related to real hw device and the cb_priv of flow_block_cb is
the indr_priv which related to indr tunnel device.
Fixes: 1fac52da5942 ("net: flow_offload: consolidate indirect flow_block infrastructure")
Signed-off-by: wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>
---
net/core/flow_offload.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/flow_offload.c b/net/core/flow_offload.c
index 0cfc35e..5ceb2d1 100644
--- a/net/core/flow_offload.c
+++ b/net/core/flow_offload.c
@@ -372,14 +372,13 @@ int flow_indr_dev_register(flow_indr_block_bind_cb_t *cb, void *cb_priv)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(flow_indr_dev_register);
-static void __flow_block_indr_cleanup(flow_setup_cb_t *setup_cb, void *cb_priv,
+static void __flow_block_indr_cleanup(flow_setup_cb_t *setup_cb,
struct list_head *cleanup_list)
{
struct flow_block_cb *this, *next;
list_for_each_entry_safe(this, next, &flow_block_indr_list, indr.list) {
- if (this->cb == setup_cb &&
- this->cb_priv == cb_priv) {
+ if (this->cb == setup_cb) {
list_move(&this->indr.list, cleanup_list);
return;
}
@@ -418,7 +417,7 @@ void flow_indr_dev_unregister(flow_indr_block_bind_cb_t *cb, void *cb_priv,
return;
}
- __flow_block_indr_cleanup(setup_cb, cb_priv, &cleanup_list);
+ __flow_block_indr_cleanup(setup_cb, &cleanup_list);
mutex_unlock(&flow_indr_block_lock);
flow_block_indr_notify(&cleanup_list);
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists