netdev - Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Fix potential memory leak in perf events parser

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 11 Jun 2020 15:17:17 +0200
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Chen Wandun <chenwandun@...wei.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Cheng Jian <cj.chengjian@...wei.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Fix potential memory leak in perf events
 parser

> Fix potential memory leak in function parse_events_term__sym_hw()
> and parse_events_term__clone().

Would you like to add the tag “Fixes” to the commit message?


…
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
…
> @@ -2957,9 +2958,20 @@  int parse_events_term__sym_hw(struct parse_events_term **term,
>  	sym = &event_symbols_hw[idx];
>
>  	str = strdup(sym->symbol);
> -	if (!str)
> +	if (!str) {
> +		if (!config)
> +			free(temp.config);
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> -	return new_term(term, &temp, str, 0);
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = new_term(term, &temp, str, 0);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		free(str);
> +		if (!config)
> +			free(temp.config);
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
>  }
…

How do you think about to add jump targets for a bit of
common exception handling code in these function implementations?

Regards,
Markus