[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200612100111.GA3157576@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 12:01:11 +0200
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Cheng Jian <cj.chengjian@...wei.com>,
Chen Wandun <chenwandun@...wei.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] perf tools: Fix potential memory leaks in perf
events parser
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 08:50:58PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Fix memory leak of in function parse_events_term__sym_hw()
> > and parse_events_term__clone() when error occur.
>
> How do you think about a wording variant like the following?
>
> Release a configuration object after a string duplication failed.
>
> Regards,
> Markus
Hi,
This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.
Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.
Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
Powered by blists - more mailing lists