[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200614002935.3a371a8be63f9424ffdb745c@uniroma2.it>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 00:29:35 +0200
From: Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@...roma2.it>
To: Dinesh G Dutt <didutt@...il.com>
Cc: Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@...roma2.it>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Shrijeet Mukherjee <shrijeet@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Donald Sharp <sharpd@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Stefano Salsano <stefano.salsano@...roma2.it>,
Paolo Lungaroni <paolo.lungaroni@...t.it>,
Ahmed Abdelsalam <ahabdels@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC,net-next, 0/5] Strict mode for VRF
On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:05:49 -0700
Dinesh G Dutt <didutt@...il.com> wrote:
> Thanks for doing this Andrea. This is a very important patch. I'll let
> the others comment on the specificity of the patch, but strict mode=1
> should be the default .
>
> Dinesh
Hi Dinesh,
thanks for your comments! I chose to disable the strict mode(=0) by default to
be conservative.
Andrea
Powered by blists - more mailing lists