netdev - Re: [RFC,net-next, 0/5] Strict mode for VRF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <920434b5-f557-2ee3-d64a-6aa08d861297@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 13 Jun 2020 18:33:09 -0600
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Dinesh Dutt <didutt@...il.com>,
        Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@...roma2.it>
Cc:     David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Shrijeet Mukherjee <shrijeet@...il.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Donald Sharp <sharpd@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        Stefano Salsano <stefano.salsano@...roma2.it>,
        Paolo Lungaroni <paolo.lungaroni@...t.it>,
        Ahmed Abdelsalam <ahabdels@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC,net-next, 0/5] Strict mode for VRF

On 6/13/20 4:39 PM, Dinesh Dutt wrote:
> Understand Andrea. I guess I didn't say it well. What I meant to say was
> that the strict mode is the default expected behavior in a classical router.
> 

it has to be off by default for backwards compatibility.