netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: fec: fix ref count leaking when pm_runtime_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200614153018.GA2663587@kroah.com>
Date:   Sun, 14 Jun 2020 17:30:18 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc:     Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@...il.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Navid Emamdoost <emamd001@....edu>,
        Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>,
        Stephen McCamant <mccamant@...umn.edu>,
        Qiushi Wu <wu000273@....edu>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Fugang Duan <fugang.duan@....com>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: fec: fix ref count leaking when pm_runtime_get_sync
 fails

On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 10:25:38AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > in fec_enet_mdio_read, …
> 
> I am curious under which circumstances you would like to improve
> such commit messages.
> 
> * Will the tag “Fixes” become helpful?
> 
> * Which source code analysis tools did trigger to send
>   update suggestions according to 16 similar issues for today?
> 

Hi,

This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.

Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list.  I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore.  Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.

Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all.  The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback.  Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot