netdev - Re: [RFC,net-next, 2/5] vrf: track associations between VRF devices and tables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200614232325.c710c9c2e71f66202b51ee46@uniroma2.it>
Date:   Sun, 14 Jun 2020 23:23:25 +0200
From:   Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@...roma2.it>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc:     Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Shrijeet Mukherjee <shrijeet@...il.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Donald Sharp <sharpd@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        Dinesh Dutt <didutt@...il.com>,
        Stefano Salsano <stefano.salsano@...roma2.it>,
        Paolo Lungaroni <paolo.lungaroni@...t.it>,
        Ahmed Abdelsalam <ahabdels@...il.com>,
        Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@...roma2.it>
Subject: Re: [RFC,net-next, 2/5] vrf: track associations between VRF devices
 and tables

On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 18:34:25 -0600
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:

> On 6/13/20 4:53 PM, Andrea Mayer wrote:
> > Hi Stephen,
> > thanks for your questions.
> > 
> > On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 12:28:59 -0700
> > Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org> wrote:
> > 
> >>> +
> >>> +	 * Conversely, shared_table is decreased when a vrf is de-associated
> >>> +	 * from a table with exactly two associated vrfs.
> >>> +	 */
> >>> +	int shared_tables;
> >>
> >> Should this be unsigned?
> >> Should it be a fixed size?
> > 
> > Yes. I think an u32 would be reasonable for the shared_table.
> > What do you think?
> > 
> 
> u32 or unsigned int is fine.

Hi David,
I will use the u32.

thanks,
Andrea