[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+h21hrUwjrLY+zihpeYqEre6fN6TX-eDZFn1oi+7jLLGVmYcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 23:59:23 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com>
Cc: Po Liu <Po.Liu@....com>, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/2] net/sched: act_gate: fix NULL dereference in tcf_gate_init()
Hi Davide,
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 22:31, Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> it is possible to see a KASAN use-after-free, immediately followed by a
> NULL dereference crash, with the following command:
>
> # tc action add action gate index 3 cycle-time 100000000ns \
> > cycle-time-ext 100000000ns clockid CLOCK_TAI
>
> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in tcf_action_init_1+0x8eb/0x960
> Write of size 1 at addr ffff88810a5908bc by task tc/883
>
> CPU: 0 PID: 883 Comm: tc Not tainted 5.7.0+ #188
> Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 1.11.1-4.module+el8.1.0+4066+0f1aadab 04/01/2014
> Call Trace:
> dump_stack+0x75/0xa0
> print_address_description.constprop.6+0x1a/0x220
> kasan_report.cold.9+0x37/0x7c
> tcf_action_init_1+0x8eb/0x960
> tcf_action_init+0x157/0x2a0
> tcf_action_add+0xd9/0x2f0
> tc_ctl_action+0x2a3/0x39d
> rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x5f3/0x920
> netlink_rcv_skb+0x120/0x380
> netlink_unicast+0x439/0x630
> netlink_sendmsg+0x714/0xbf0
> sock_sendmsg+0xe2/0x110
> ____sys_sendmsg+0x5b4/0x890
> ___sys_sendmsg+0xe9/0x160
> __sys_sendmsg+0xd3/0x170
> do_syscall_64+0x9a/0x370
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
>
> [...]
>
> KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000070-0x0000000000000077]
> CPU: 0 PID: 883 Comm: tc Tainted: G B 5.7.0+ #188
> Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 1.11.1-4.module+el8.1.0+4066+0f1aadab 04/01/2014
> RIP: 0010:tcf_action_fill_size+0xa3/0xf0
> [....]
> RSP: 0018:ffff88813a48f250 EFLAGS: 00010212
> RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000094 RCX: ffffffffa47c3eb6
> RDX: 000000000000000e RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: 0000000000000070
> RBP: ffff88810a590800 R08: 0000000000000004 R09: ffffed1027491e03
> R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffffed1027491e03 R12: 0000000000000000
> R13: 0000000000000000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffff88810a590800
> FS: 00007f62cae8ce40(0000) GS:ffff888147c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 00007f62c9d20a10 CR3: 000000013a52a000 CR4: 0000000000340ef0
> Call Trace:
> tcf_action_init+0x172/0x2a0
> tcf_action_add+0xd9/0x2f0
> tc_ctl_action+0x2a3/0x39d
> rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x5f3/0x920
> netlink_rcv_skb+0x120/0x380
> netlink_unicast+0x439/0x630
> netlink_sendmsg+0x714/0xbf0
> sock_sendmsg+0xe2/0x110
> ____sys_sendmsg+0x5b4/0x890
> ___sys_sendmsg+0xe9/0x160
> __sys_sendmsg+0xd3/0x170
> do_syscall_64+0x9a/0x370
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
>
> this is caused by the test on 'cycletime_ext', that is still unassigned
> when the action is newly created. This makes the action .init() return 0
> without calling tcf_idr_insert(), hence the UAF + crash.
>
> rework the logic that prevents zero values of cycle-time, as follows:
>
> 1) 'tcfg_cycletime_ext' seems to be unused in the action software path,
> and it was already possible by other means to obtain non-zero
> cycletime and zero cycletime-ext. So, removing that test should not
> cause any damage.
> 2) while at it, we must prevent overwriting configuration data with wrong
> ones: use a temporary variable for 'tcfg_cycletime', and validate it
> preserving the original semantic (that allowed computing the cycle
> time as the sum of all intervals, when not specified by
> TCA_GATE_CYCLE_TIME).
> 3) remove the test on 'tcfg_cycletime', no more useful, and avoid
> returning -EFAULT, which did not seem an appropriate return value for
> a wrong netlink attribute.
>
> v2: remove useless 'return;' at the end of void gate_get_start_time()
>
> Fixes: a51c328df310 ("net: qos: introduce a gate control flow action")
> CC: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com>
> ---
> net/sched/act_gate.c | 36 +++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/act_gate.c b/net/sched/act_gate.c
> index 9c628591f452..6775ccf355b0 100644
> --- a/net/sched/act_gate.c
> +++ b/net/sched/act_gate.c
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static ktime_t gate_get_time(struct tcf_gate *gact)
> return KTIME_MAX;
> }
>
> -static int gate_get_start_time(struct tcf_gate *gact, ktime_t *start)
> +static void gate_get_start_time(struct tcf_gate *gact, ktime_t *start)
> {
> struct tcf_gate_params *param = &gact->param;
> ktime_t now, base, cycle;
> @@ -43,18 +43,13 @@ static int gate_get_start_time(struct tcf_gate *gact, ktime_t *start)
>
> if (ktime_after(base, now)) {
> *start = base;
> - return 0;
> + return;
> }
>
> cycle = param->tcfg_cycletime;
>
> - /* cycle time should not be zero */
> - if (!cycle)
> - return -EFAULT;
> -
> n = div64_u64(ktime_sub_ns(now, base), cycle);
> *start = ktime_add_ns(base, (n + 1) * cycle);
> - return 0;
> }
>
> static void gate_start_timer(struct tcf_gate *gact, ktime_t start)
> @@ -287,12 +282,12 @@ static int tcf_gate_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
> enum tk_offsets tk_offset = TK_OFFS_TAI;
> struct nlattr *tb[TCA_GATE_MAX + 1];
> struct tcf_chain *goto_ch = NULL;
> + u64 cycletime, basetime = 0;
You must initialize cycletime with zero here...
> struct tcf_gate_params *p;
> s32 clockid = CLOCK_TAI;
> struct tcf_gate *gact;
> struct tc_gate *parm;
> int ret = 0, err;
> - u64 basetime = 0;
> u32 gflags = 0;
> s32 prio = -1;
> ktime_t start;
> @@ -375,11 +370,8 @@ static int tcf_gate_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
> spin_lock_bh(&gact->tcf_lock);
> p = &gact->param;
>
> - if (tb[TCA_GATE_CYCLE_TIME]) {
> - p->tcfg_cycletime = nla_get_u64(tb[TCA_GATE_CYCLE_TIME]);
> - if (!p->tcfg_cycletime_ext)
> - goto chain_put;
> - }
> + if (tb[TCA_GATE_CYCLE_TIME])
> + cycletime = nla_get_u64(tb[TCA_GATE_CYCLE_TIME]);
>
> if (tb[TCA_GATE_ENTRY_LIST]) {
> err = parse_gate_list(tb[TCA_GATE_ENTRY_LIST], p, extack);
> @@ -387,14 +379,19 @@ static int tcf_gate_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
> goto chain_put;
> }
>
> - if (!p->tcfg_cycletime) {
> + if (!cycletime) {
...otherwise it won't enter this 'if' block here.
> struct tcfg_gate_entry *entry;
> ktime_t cycle = 0;
>
> list_for_each_entry(entry, &p->entries, list)
> cycle = ktime_add_ns(cycle, entry->interval);
> - p->tcfg_cycletime = cycle;
> + cycletime = cycle;
> + if (!cycletime) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto chain_put;
> + }
> }
> + p->tcfg_cycletime = cycletime;
>
> if (tb[TCA_GATE_CYCLE_TIME_EXT])
> p->tcfg_cycletime_ext =
> @@ -408,14 +405,7 @@ static int tcf_gate_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
> gact->tk_offset = tk_offset;
> hrtimer_init(&gact->hitimer, clockid, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_SOFT);
> gact->hitimer.function = gate_timer_func;
> -
> - err = gate_get_start_time(gact, &start);
> - if (err < 0) {
> - NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack,
> - "Internal error: failed get start time");
> - release_entry_list(&p->entries);
> - goto chain_put;
> - }
> + gate_get_start_time(gact, &start);
>
> gact->current_close_time = start;
> gact->current_gate_status = GATE_ACT_GATE_OPEN | GATE_ACT_PENDING;
> --
> 2.26.2
>
Cheers,
-Vladimir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists