netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] perf tools: Fix potential memory leaks in perf events parser

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <507a2266-39cd-0887-1b6b-59764fddd153@web.de>
Date:   Mon, 15 Jun 2020 10:45:40 +0200
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Cheng Jian <cj.chengjian@...wei.com>,
        Chen Wandun <chenwandun@...wei.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] perf tools: Fix potential memory leaks in perf
 events parser

> Fix memory leak of in function parse_events_term__sym_hw()
> and parse_events_term__clone() when string duplication failed.

Can a wording like “Fix memory leaks in …” be more appropriate for
the final commit message?
Would you find any other description variant more pleasing?

Regards,
Markus