lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200615135739.798f4489@coco.lan>
Date:   Mon, 15 Jun 2020 13:57:39 +0200
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Sandy Huang <hjc@...k-chips.com>,
        Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/29] dt: fix broken links due to txt->yaml renames

Hi Mark,

Em Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:19:27 +0100
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> escreveu:

> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 08:46:52AM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > There are some new broken doc links due to yaml renames
> > at DT. Developers should really run:  
> 
> I also previously acked this one in 20200504100822.GA5491@...ena.org.uk.
> Has anything changed here to cause the ack to be dropped?

Both patches are the same. I forgot to add your acks on my tree. 

My bad!

Thanks,
Mauro

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ