[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200615150037.21529-1-ap420073@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 15:00:37 +0000
From: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ap420073@...il.com, fw@...len.de
Subject: [PATCH net] net: core: reduce recursion limit value
In the current code, ->ndo_start_xmit() can be executed recursively only
10 times because of stack memory.
But, in the case of the vxlan, 10 recursion limit value results in
a stack overflow.
In the current code, the nested interface is limited by 8 depth.
There is no critical reason that the recursion limitation value should
be 10.
So, it would be good to be the same value with the limitation value of
nesting interface depth.
Test commands:
ip link add vxlan10 type vxlan vni 10 dstport 4789 srcport 4789 4789
ip link set vxlan10 up
ip a a 192.168.10.1/24 dev vxlan10
ip n a 192.168.10.2 dev vxlan10 lladdr fc:22:33:44:55:66 nud permanent
for i in {9..0}
do
let A=$i+1
ip link add vxlan$i type vxlan vni $i dstport 4789 srcport 4789 4789
ip link set vxlan$i up
ip a a 192.168.$i.1/24 dev vxlan$i
ip n a 192.168.$i.2 dev vxlan$i lladdr fc:22:33:44:55:66 nud permanent
bridge fdb add fc:22:33:44:55:66 dev vxlan$A dst 192.168.$i.2 self
done
hping3 192.168.10.2 -2 -d 60000
Splat looks like:
[ 103.814237][ T1127] =============================================================================
[ 103.871955][ T1127] BUG kmalloc-2k (Tainted: G B ): Padding overwritten. 0x00000000897a2e4f-0x000
[ 103.873187][ T1127] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ 103.873187][ T1127]
[ 103.874252][ T1127] INFO: Slab 0x000000005cccc724 objects=5 used=5 fp=0x0000000000000000 flags=0x10000000001020
[ 103.881323][ T1127] CPU: 3 PID: 1127 Comm: hping3 Tainted: G B 5.7.0+ #575
[ 103.882131][ T1127] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006
[ 103.883006][ T1127] Call Trace:
[ 103.883324][ T1127] dump_stack+0x96/0xdb
[ 103.883716][ T1127] slab_err+0xad/0xd0
[ 103.884106][ T1127] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x30
[ 103.884620][ T1127] ? get_partial_node.isra.78+0x140/0x360
[ 103.885214][ T1127] slab_pad_check.part.53+0xf7/0x160
[ 103.885769][ T1127] ? pskb_expand_head+0x110/0xe10
[ 103.886316][ T1127] check_slab+0x97/0xb0
[ 103.886763][ T1127] alloc_debug_processing+0x84/0x1a0
[ 103.887308][ T1127] ___slab_alloc+0x5a5/0x630
[ 103.887765][ T1127] ? pskb_expand_head+0x110/0xe10
[ 103.888265][ T1127] ? lock_downgrade+0x730/0x730
[ 103.888762][ T1127] ? pskb_expand_head+0x110/0xe10
[ 103.889244][ T1127] ? __slab_alloc+0x3e/0x80
[ 103.889675][ T1127] __slab_alloc+0x3e/0x80
[ 103.890108][ T1127] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xc7/0x420
[ ... ]
Fixes: 97cdcf37b57e ("net: place xmit recursion in softnet data")
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
---
include/linux/netdevice.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index 6fc613ed8eae..39e28e11863c 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -3157,7 +3157,7 @@ static inline int dev_recursion_level(void)
return this_cpu_read(softnet_data.xmit.recursion);
}
-#define XMIT_RECURSION_LIMIT 10
+#define XMIT_RECURSION_LIMIT 8
static inline bool dev_xmit_recursion(void)
{
return unlikely(__this_cpu_read(softnet_data.xmit.recursion) >
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists