[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200616184805.k7eowfhdevasqite@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 19:48:06 +0100
From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: qrtr: Migrate nameservice to kernel from
userspace
Hi Manivannan, David
On 02/13/20 14:44, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
[...]
> + trace_printk("advertising new server [%d:%x]@[%d:%d]\n",
> + srv->service, srv->instance, srv->node, srv->port);
I can't tell exactly from the discussion whether this is the version that got
merged into 5.7 or not, but it does match the commit message.
This patch introduces several trace_printk() which AFAIK is intended for
debugging only and shouldn't make it into mainline kernels.
It causes this big message to be printed to the log too
[ 0.000000] **********************************************************
[ 0.000000] ** NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE **
[ 0.000000] ** **
[ 0.000000] ** trace_printk() being used. Allocating extra memory. **
[ 0.000000] ** **
[ 0.000000] ** This means that this is a DEBUG kernel and it is **
[ 0.000000] ** unsafe for production use. **
[ 0.000000] ** **
[ 0.000000] ** If you see this message and you are not debugging **
[ 0.000000] ** the kernel, report this immediately to your vendor! **
[ 0.000000] ** **
[ 0.000000] ** NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE **
[ 0.000000] **********************************************************
Shouldn't this be replaced with one of pr_*() variants instead?
Thanks
--
Qais Yousef
Powered by blists - more mailing lists