[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200617165902.GB14228@x1.vandijck-laurijssen.be>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 18:59:02 +0200
From: Kurt Van Dijck <dev.kurt@...dijck-laurijssen.be>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
wg@...ndegger.com, kernel@...tin.sperl.org,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Add Microchip MCP25XXFD CAN driver
On do, 11 jun 2020 18:26:19 +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 6/10/20 9:44 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > This series adds CAN network driver support for Microchip MCP25XXFD CAN
> > Controller with MCP2517FD as the target controller version. This series is
> > mostly inspired (or taken) from the previous iterations posted by Martin Sperl.
> > I've trimmed down the parts which are not necessary for the initial version
> > to ease review. Still the series is relatively huge but I hope to get some
> > reviews (post -rcX ofc!).
> >
> > Link to the origial series posted by Martin:
> > https://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg284462.html
> >
> > I've not changed the functionality much but done some considerable amount of
> > cleanups and also preserved the authorship of Martin for all the patches he has
> > posted earlier. This series has been tested on 96Boards RB3 platform by myself
> > and Martin has tested the previous version on Rpi3 with external MCP2517FD
> > controller.
>
> I initially started looking at Martin's driver and it was not using several
> modern CAN driver infrastructures. I then posted some cleanup patches but Martin
> was not working on the driver any more. Then I decided to rewrite the driver,
> that is the one I'm hoping to mainline soon.
>
> Can you give it a try?
>
> https://github.com/marckleinebudde/linux/commits/v5.6-rpi/mcp25xxfd-20200607-41
Hi Marc,
I'm in the process of getting a Variscite imx8m mini SOM online, with
MCP2517FD. The 4.19 kernel that comes with it, has a driver that is
clearly inspired by the one of Martin Sperl (not investigated too much
yet). I have problems of probing the chip when the bus is under full
load (under not full load, the probing only occasionally fails) due to
the modeswitch test.
Is there a real difference in yours between the rpi and sunxi branches?
Is there much evolution since -36 or would you mind to backport your
latest -42 to 4.19?
I will work on this the upcoming days. I can't do extensive tests, but
rather a works-for-me test that includes bitrate probe.
I only have 1 such board right now, and no other FD hardware.
Kurt
>
> Marc
Powered by blists - more mailing lists