lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:03:30 +0200 From: Jo -l <joel.voyer@...il.com> To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> Cc: dsterba@...e.cz, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>, "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-ppp@...r.kernel.org, wireguard@...ts.zx2c4.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, target-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org, ecryptfs@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] mm, treewide: Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() Bonjour, Désolé, aucune traduction possible, En français pour comprendre! Merci slts > Le 17 06 2020 à 02:37, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> a écrit : > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 01:01:30AM +0200, David Sterba wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:53:50AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: >>> On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 21:57 -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >>>> v4: >>>> - Break out the memzero_explicit() change as suggested by Dan Carpenter >>>> so that it can be backported to stable. >>>> - Drop the "crypto: Remove unnecessary memzero_explicit()" patch for >>>> now as there can be a bit more discussion on what is best. It will be >>>> introduced as a separate patch later on after this one is merged. >>> >>> To this larger audience and last week without reply: >>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/573b3fbd5927c643920e1364230c296b23e7584d.camel@perches.com/ >>> >>> Are there _any_ fastpath uses of kfree or vfree? >> >> I'd consider kfree performance critical for cases where it is called >> under locks. If possible the kfree is moved outside of the critical >> section, but we have rbtrees or lists that get deleted under locks and >> restructuring the code to do eg. splice and free it outside of the lock >> is not always possible. > > Not just performance critical, but correctness critical. Since kvfree() > may allocate from the vmalloc allocator, I really think that kvfree() > should assert that it's !in_atomic(). Otherwise we can get into trouble > if we end up calling vfree() and have to take the mutex. Jo-l joel.voyer@...il.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists