netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: macb: reject unsupported rgmii delays

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 17 Jun 2020 14:38:25 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Helmut Grohne <helmut.grohne@...enta.de>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: macb: reject unsupported rgmii delays

On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 14:34, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
<linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
>

>
> Why are you so abrasive?
>
> Not responding to this until you start behaving more reasonably.
>
> --
> RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

Sorry.
What I meant to say is: the documentation is unclear. It has been
interpreted in conflicting ways, where the strict interpretations have
proven to have practical limitations, and the practical
interpretations have been accused of being incorrect. In my opinion
there is no way to fix it without introducing new bindings, which I am
not sure is really worth doing.

Thanks,
-Vladimir