netdev - Re: [PATCH] net/9p: Fix sparse endian warning in trans

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200618190934.GB20699@nautica>
Date:   Thu, 18 Jun 2020 21:09:34 +0200
From:   Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
To:     Alexander Kapshuk <alexander.kapshuk@...il.com>
Cc:     ericvh@...il.com, lucho@...kov.net, davem@...emloft.net,
        kuba@...nel.org, v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/9p: Fix sparse endian warning in trans_fd.c

Alexander Kapshuk wrote on Thu, Jun 18, 2020:
> Address sparse endian warning:
> net/9p/trans_fd.c:932:28: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
> net/9p/trans_fd.c:932:28:    expected restricted __be32 [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] s_addr
> net/9p/trans_fd.c:932:28:    got unsigned long
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kapshuk <alexander.kapshuk@...il.com>

INADDR_ANY is 0 so this really is noop but sure, less warnings is always
good. I'll take this one for 5.9.
Thanks!
-- 
Dominique